2.2.1. A Phrasal Rule in Syntax and Semantics
Go to background recovery
Go back to abstract
Go back to phenomenon
Go back to problem
Go back to framework

(7) kame o to

MAJ 1

HEAD 2

COMPS 3

ARG_ST 4

CONTENT 5

NON-HEAD-DAUGHTER

kame o

MAJ k

HEAD

KFORM acc

MOD 6

MAJ v

ARG_ST 7

REL_ACC

ARG turtlef(x___quan)

REL_QUAN {(x,y) | The intersection between x and y is not equivalent to the null set.}

COMPS end

ARG_ST -

CONTENT no

HEAD-DAUGHTER

to

MAJ 1 c

HEAD 2

VFORM finite

MOD [MAJ v] [ARG_ST [REL_FIN_COMP 7]]

COMPS 3

FIRST 6

MAJ v

HEAD [VFORM finite]

ARG_ST 7

CONTENT 7

REST end

ARG_ST 4 -

CONTENT 5 [REL_X no]


(8) kame o to sensei ga itta

CONTENT

ARG saidf(x___fin_comp)(x___nom)

REL_NOM [ARG teacherf(x___quan)] [REL_QUAN {(x,y) | The intersection between x and y is not equivalent to the null set.}]

REL_FIN_COMP

REL_ACC

ARG turtlef(x___quan)

REL_QUAN {(x,y) | The intersection between x and y is not equivalent to the null set.}



Go to background recovery
Go back to abstract
Go back to phenomenon
Go back to problem
Go back to framework